- From: lcdproc AT neko.me.uk (Chris Lansley)
- Subject: [Lcdproc] [PATCH] MtxOrb.c - patch 3
- Date: Wed Sep 29 13:32:01 2004
Hi Rene,
>
I've been on vacation for the past three weeks (without internet
>
access). Obviously, that makes it hard to reply to mail.
THREE WEEKS! I hope you enjoyed yourself! :-)
>
I guess William gave you CVS access.
Yep.
>
Unfortunately you didn't create a 0-4-6 branch before checking your
>
changes in.
That's right - I tried looking for guidelines on LCDproc's use of CVS
but found nothing. I just assumed you would branch/tag the 0-4-5 branch
when you released 0-4-6. [Is my change the first since 0-4-6?]
>
It's probably best to create a 0-4-x branch and only tag releases anyway.
Agreed.
>
I'll have to think about how to fix this a little further.
Let me know if you want me to undo the changes to the 0-4-5 branch, and
resubmit them to 0-4-x when it's created.
>
Can I talk you into merging the MtxOrb changes from the 0-4-? branches
>
into HEAD btw? You appear to have the hardware to test with...
The HEAD (0.5) is so different that I'm unhappy doing that. BUT once I
have the 0.4.5 version in a happy state then I hope to start working on
the 0.5 version. My thinking is: both 0.4.5 and 0.5 MtxOrb needs a
complete rewrite, but that's overkill for 0.4.5 - so it's best to just
fix the big bugs. It would be worth doing more with the 0.5 MtxOrb,
that's assuming that 0.5 is ever going to be released as a release?!
Chris.
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.18.