Chronological Thread 

< Chronological >      < Thread >

---

Hi Rene,

> I've been on vacation for the past three weeks (without internet
> access). Obviously, that makes it hard to reply to mail.

THREE WEEKS! I hope you enjoyed yourself! :-)


> I guess William gave you CVS access.

Yep.


> Unfortunately you didn't create a 0-4-6 branch before checking your
> changes in.

That's right - I tried looking for guidelines on LCDproc's use of CVS
but found nothing. I just assumed you would branch/tag the 0-4-5 branch
when you released 0-4-6. [Is my change the first since 0-4-6?]

> It's probably best to create a 0-4-x branch and only tag releases anyway.

Agreed.

> I'll have to think about how to fix this a little further.

Let me know if you want me to undo the changes to the 0-4-5 branch, and
resubmit them to 0-4-x when it's created.


> Can I talk you into merging the MtxOrb changes from the 0-4-? branches
> into HEAD btw? You appear to have the hardware to test with...

The HEAD (0.5) is so different that I'm unhappy doing that. BUT once I
have the 0.4.5 version in a happy state then I hope to start working on
the 0.5 version. My thinking is: both 0.4.5 and 0.5 MtxOrb needs a
complete rewrite, but that's overkill for 0.4.5 - so it's best to just
fix the big bugs. It would be worth doing more with the 0.5 MtxOrb,
that's assuming that 0.5 is ever going to be released as a release?!


Chris.

---

• [Lcdproc] [PATCH] MtxOrb.c - patch 3, Chris Lansley, 09/26/2004
  • [Lcdproc] [PATCH] MtxOrb.c - patch 3, Chris Lansley, 09/29/2004
    • [Lcdproc] [PATCH] MtxOrb.c - patch 3, Rene Wagner, 09/29/2004
      • [Lcdproc] [PATCH] MtxOrb.c - patch 3, Chris Lansley, 09/29/2004
        • [Lcdproc] [PATCH] MtxOrb.c - patch 3, Rene Wagner, 09/29/2004
          • [Lcdproc] [PATCH] MtxOrb.c - patch 3, Chris Lansley, 09/29/2004
            • [Lcdproc] [PATCH] MtxOrb.c - patch 3, Joris Robijn, 09/29/2004

---

Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.18.