- From: reenoo AT gmx.de (Rene Wagner)
- Subject: [Lcdproc] more work in progress
- Date: Tue Dec 11 12:48:01 2001
"Joris Robijn"
<joris AT robijn.net>
wrote:
>
> > > Should we now go to a 0.5pre1 version ? What do others say ?
>
> >
>
> > Were we going to release v0.4.3, or jump straight to a developer's
>
> > release?
>
>
>
> I think we should try to get things stable enough to release a 0.4.3
>
> version. We were only looking for way to enable Joris to get his API
>
> changes and other things into CVS, right Joris?
>
> I would like to do a kind of feature freeze NOW, so that we can do
>
> testing, testing, testing and testing ;)
>
>
Yes, let's be sure what we release...
That's lways a good idea, isn't it?
>
Speaking of that, that old socket vulnerability that was mentioned on
>
some security site, is that solved already ?
In current ("dev") CVS AFAIK yes!
>
I will not do anything to the client interface.
OK! Sorry, I misunderstood you :(
>
I will adapt driver
>
so that they work again.
Much work to be done, right? Just let me know what to change and I'll
do it for my driver (lcdm001.c).
>
Only the icon function will initially not
>
work correctly, because David Glaude is working on that.
>
>
> A 0.5preN version might be the possibility to get all API changes and
>
> maybe even menu support (I'd like to work on that) into LCDproc.
>
>
Would be great. I guess you mean client supplied menus.
Exactly ;) But we need to agree on a way of handling the keys first.
That's what your API changes are about, right?
>
If noone else
>
has already done so, I can check how much there is to be done on key-
>
reservations.
You mean a client reserving a key?
>
>
What I can do is start a CVS branch, instead of using the default
>
HEAD branch. Later, when it's time for 0.5, we can make that the
>
default branch. Good plan ?
Great plan ;)
But please be patient with CVS newbies like me ;)
I'm really happy when a commit is successful ;)
Rene
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.18.