Chronological Thread 

< Chronological >      < Thread >

---

---
joris AT robijn.net
wrote ---
> Yes, let's be sure what we release...
> Speaking of that, that old socket vulnerability that was mentioned on
> some security site, is that solved already ?

I *think* it was solved. Can someone confirm?

> I will not do anything to the client interface. I will adapt driver
> so that they work again. Only the icon function will initially not
> work correctly, because David Glaude is working on that.

Sounds good, thanks.

> Would be great. I guess you mean client supplied menus. If noone else
> has already done so, I can check how much there is to be done on key-
> reservations.
>
> What I can do is start a CVS branch, instead of using the default
> HEAD branch. Later, when it's time for 0.5, we can make that the
> default branch. Good plan ?

I like this alot. Thanks for keeping us informed!

---

• [Lcdproc] more work in progress, Joris Robijn, 12/09/2001
  • [Lcdproc] more work in progress, William W. Ferrell, 12/10/2001
    • [Lcdproc] more work in progress, Rene Wagner, 12/10/2001
      • [Lcdproc] more work in progress, Joris Robijn, 12/10/2001
        • [Lcdproc] more work in progress, William W. Ferrell, 12/11/2001
          • [Lcdproc] more work in progress, Guillaume Filion, 12/11/2001
        • [Lcdproc] is _icon a problem/still in use?, <dglaudemailing AT gmx.net (David GLAUDE Mailing), 12/11/2001
          • [Lcdproc] is _icon a problem/still in use?, Rene Wagner, 12/11/2001
          • [Lcdproc] is _icon a problem/still in use?, mythos, 12/11/2001
            • [Lcdproc] is _icon a problem/still in use?, <dglaudemailing AT gmx.net (David GLAUDE Mailing), 12/11/2001
        • [Lcdproc] more work in progress, Rene Wagner, 12/11/2001
          • [Lcdproc] more work in progress, Joris Robijn, 12/11/2001
      • [Lcdproc] more work in progress, <dglaudemailing AT gmx.net (David GLAUDE Mailing), 12/11/2001

---

Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.18.