LCDproc development and user support list

Text archives Help


AW: [lcdproc] LCDproc++


Chronological Thread 
  • From: EHE AT CompuGROUP.COM (EHE AT CompuGROUP.COM)
  • Subject: AW: [lcdproc] LCDproc++
  • Date: Thu, 9 Mar 2000 10:56:10 +0100

I don't think that corba is a good idea.
LCDproc is often used for standalone devices,
like routers or mp3 players. Using corba would
mean that you have to install a corba orb on a
machine with very small ram and disk space.
Too much overhead.

- Erik

> ----------
> Von: Mindaugas
> Idzelis[SMTP:mai3116 AT rit.edu]
> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 8. M=E4rz 2000 21:10
> An:
> lcdproc AT lists.omnipotent.net
> Betreff: [lcdproc] LCDproc++
>=20
> Hello everyone!
>=20
> My name is Min Idzelis, and I'm designing LCDproc++, which could =
very
> well be the successor of LCDproc. It is going to be completely =
rewritten
> in
> C++ and feature flexibility and portability. I am looking for =
suggestion,
> volounteers, stimulating discussion, etc. Currently, I am debating =
using
> CORBA as the protocol middleware. What does everyone think about =
this? I
> have design documents, and UML made up, and it will be posted on the
> sourceforge web soon. Let me know what you all think.
>=20
> --min
>=20
>=20
>=20
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this list send a blank message to
> lcdproc-unsubscribe AT lists.omnipotent.net
>=20


-----------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list send a blank message to
lcdproc-unsubscribe AT lists.omnipotent.net



  • AW: [lcdproc] LCDproc++, EHE AT CompuGROUP.COM, 03/09/2000

Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.18.

Top of page