- From: blt AT ComPorts.com (Benjamin Tse)
- Subject: [lcdproc] lcdproc server incredibly slow
- Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2000 09:38:12 +1100
On Sun, Feb 13, 2000 at 09:54:20PM -0700, EXT Scott Scriven wrote:
>
* Benjamin Tse
>
<tse AT morphine.apac.nokia.com>
>
wrote:
>
> It can cope with 8 fps at the expense of CPU speed. A 16x2
>
> display consumes ~5% of CPU when the whole display needs to be
>
> updated. This only happens in the CPU screen of lcdproc. The
>
> other screens use a modest 1-2% of CPU.
>
>
It uses 1-5% of the CPU? Wow.. On my system (CFontz serial
>
LCD), the LCDd server uses a constant "0.0%" of the CPU
>
(according to "top"), and the lcdproc client uses 0.1% - 1.0%,
>
depending on which stat it's gathering. (the XLoad screen
>
seems to take the most)
1-5% is due to the loops the CPU needs to do to maintain the
timing. At least it's an improvement on the 50% someone was getting 6
months ago :-).
The (other) difference in the HD44780 drivers is the cost. My setup
cost ~$15 (AUD) plus a couple of hours over a soldering iron and
hacksaw :-). I believe that MO displays can be sourced on this side of
the planet for 5-6 times this price. (Though I reckon a PIC type setup
could be done in < $50.)
I guess you get what you pay for ...
Cheers,
Ben
BTW, top in cumulative mode would give an indicative average result.
-----------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list send a blank message to
lcdproc-unsubscribe AT lists.omnipotent.net
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.18.